Tricount and Splitwise do very well what they are designed for. The problem is not there. The problem is everything else your group does with money.
Let’s start with what’s honest: if your only need is to split the bill of a weekend among friends, Tricount or Splitwise will do the job. They are good tools, they are ten years ahead in maturity, and to claim otherwise would be to lie to you.
But ask yourself a simple question: in your group, does money circulate **only** in the form of expenses to be divided?
They share expenses. They do not manage a tontine. They do not manage a common fund with contributions. They do not formalize a loan between close ones with a schedule, witnesses, and a guarantor.
This is not a flaw: it is simply not their job. They were designed for a European roommate splitting rent, not for a family that has been running a njangui for fifteen years alongside weekend shopping.
A group that holds a tontine always ends up keeping two accounts: the application for expenses, and the notebook for the tontine.
All in one place, for the same group, with the same people. This is the only thing BMD claims — and it’s the only thing that can’t be found anywhere else.
If your group only shares expenses, stay where you are: changing tools for the same need is pointless.
If your group also holds a tontine, a common fund, or lends money — and that part still lives on a notebook, a spreadsheet, or a WhatsApp thread — then what you need is not a better expense application. It’s an application that understands the rest.
Des guides clairs sur les tontines, les prêts entre proches et l'argent partagé. Pas de spam, désinscription en un clic.